Birdwatch Note
2024-09-21 21:17:00 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - Posters opinion, but link posted with the CN literally explains how United had big chances to win the game, not draw.
Written by D152AE43FB92C0D64E223BCD661A084A69570C8354BB613DC9A56D6CA37825AE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1837560347734982967
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1837601949035679757
- noteId - 1837601949035679757
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D152AE43FB92C0D64E223BCD661A084A69570C8354BB613DC9A56D6CA37825AE Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1726953420300
- tweetId - 1837560347734982967
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - Posters opinion, but link posted with the CN literally explains how United had big chances to win the game, not draw.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-09-22 00:14:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-21 23:04:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-21 17:28:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-21 16:35:43 -0500 | Rating Details |