Birdwatch Note
2024-09-21 19:22:16 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Parte del hilo está basado en el "The Myth of Man the Hunter" (2023). Otros autores han expuesto los fallos del estudio, que consideran no demuestra que no hubiera separación de tareas por genero https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513824000497 Los autores del estudio original han dado respuesta a estas preocupaciones: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11341016/
Written by E849D87A3F7889ADAE6215303A41F562DE33BBA4BF6A91567B754F4BC69C4681
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1837207550191628385
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1837573077682868616
- noteId - 1837573077682868616
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E849D87A3F7889ADAE6215303A41F562DE33BBA4BF6A91567B754F4BC69C4681 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1726946536833
- tweetId - 1837207550191628385
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Parte del hilo está basado en el "The Myth of Man the Hunter" (2023). Otros autores han expuesto los fallos del estudio, que consideran no demuestra que no hubiera separación de tareas por genero https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513824000497 Los autores del estudio original han dado respuesta a estas preocupaciones: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11341016/
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-09-24 20:04:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-24 20:00:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-24 19:07:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-24 12:12:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-24 10:37:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-24 10:18:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-24 08:08:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-24 07:43:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-24 07:01:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-24 06:40:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-24 06:09:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-22 15:41:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-22 13:59:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-22 13:59:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-22 09:32:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-22 08:52:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-22 04:54:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-22 04:45:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-22 03:53:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-22 03:34:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-22 02:39:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 22:52:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 22:31:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 18:10:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 17:44:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 17:43:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 17:35:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 17:19:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 17:18:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 16:30:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 16:28:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 15:34:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 15:24:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 15:02:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 14:24:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 14:23:15 -0500 | Rating Details |