Birdwatch Note
2024-09-21 16:13:59 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
RF Radiation is in the non-ionizing radiation part of the electromagnetic spectrum and doesn't damage DNA. The FDA maintains that current RF exposure limits from cell phones, Wi-Fi, etc., are safe. https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/cell-phones/scientific-evidence-cell-phone-safety https://factcheck.afp.com/no-evidence-5g-radiation-harmful-human-health-experts-say https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/radiation-exposure/cellular-phone-towers.html https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/health-risks-safety/radiation/everyday-things-emit-radiation/cell-phones-towers.html https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/wireless-devices-and-health-concerns https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/cell-phones/reducing-radio-frequency-exposure-cell-phones https://www.politifact.com/article/2023/jul/10/rfk-jrs-wi-fi-claim-about-human-blood-brain-barrie/ https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/cell-phones/radio-frequency-radiation-and-cell-phones https://www.epa.gov/radtown/non-ionizing-radiation-wireless-technology https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/14/tech/5g-health-conspiracy-debunked/index.html
Written by 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1837492036246601998
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1837525694554702120
- noteId - 1837525694554702120
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1726935239815
- tweetId - 1837492036246601998
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- RF Radiation is in the non-ionizing radiation part of the electromagnetic spectrum and doesn't damage DNA. The FDA maintains that current RF exposure limits from cell phones, Wi-Fi, etc., are safe. https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/cell-phones/scientific-evidence-cell-phone-safety https://factcheck.afp.com/no-evidence-5g-radiation-harmful-human-health-experts-say https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/radiation-exposure/cellular-phone-towers.html https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/health-risks-safety/radiation/everyday-things-emit-radiation/cell-phones-towers.html https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/wireless-devices-and-health-concerns https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/cell-phones/reducing-radio-frequency-exposure-cell-phones https://www.politifact.com/article/2023/jul/10/rfk-jrs-wi-fi-claim-about-human-blood-brain-barrie/ https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/cell-phones/radio-frequency-radiation-and-cell-phones https://www.epa.gov/radtown/non-ionizing-radiation-wireless-technology https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/14/tech/5g-health-conspiracy-debunked/index.html
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-09-21 16:54:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 16:02:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 15:09:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 15:09:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 14:55:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 14:40:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 14:31:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 14:18:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 14:09:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 13:34:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 13:27:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 12:55:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 12:10:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 12:05:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 11:46:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 11:41:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 11:27:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 11:22:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 11:21:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-21 11:19:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-30 11:08:18 -0600 | Rating Details |