Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-09-19 18:58:03 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The Saudis always owned Twitter. Fact. https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2022/10/28/saudis-kingdom-holding-company-to-maintain-twitter-stake The Russians would be in Kiev by now if Musk had not supplied Starlink. So how come he is a Russian asset? I would have put this in a reply but Prof Mann has limited who can reply.

Written by 2A0360EFDF7DEBA801C2EC795E84AB8F223242FE35762B7441C887EF9E0926A0
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1658830035774578690

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1836842204955881481
  • noteId - 1836842204955881481
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 2A0360EFDF7DEBA801C2EC795E84AB8F223242FE35762B7441C887EF9E0926A0 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1726772283196
  • tweetId - 1658830035774578690
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The Saudis always owned Twitter. Fact. https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2022/10/28/saudis-kingdom-holding-company-to-maintain-twitter-stake The Russians would be in Kiev by now if Musk had not supplied Starlink. So how come he is a Russian asset? I would have put this in a reply but Prof Mann has limited who can reply.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-09-19 15:43:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-19 14:58:05 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-19 14:19:30 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-19 14:14:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-21 23:41:17 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 23:02:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 16:18:59 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 13:51:50 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 13:46:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 11:24:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 10:58:22 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-21 07:00:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 22:49:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 21:49:29 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 20:09:33 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 14:26:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 14:14:18 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 11:25:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 11:23:40 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-21 00:04:58 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 22:52:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 21:34:50 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 21:12:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 19:22:06 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 18:35:40 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 18:33:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 18:13:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 14:18:42 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 11:44:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 21:41:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 19:22:25 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 18:06:42 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 15:06:18 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 13:56:55 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 13:09:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 12:30:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 11:33:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 10:02:06 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 13:17:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 11:53:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 10:57:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-20 10:48:34 -0500 Rating Details