Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-09-18 18:46:01 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

There is no such “BREAKING NEWS,” and the Court made no such decision. More than a month ago, the Court ruled on the procedural question of whether the new Biden Title IX restrictions should be enforced while appeals are pending. The Court has not resolved the merits. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/24a78_f2ah.pdf

Written by E699819370F701085A037AE84DE5712DBBC9EEBC7D746E9D9C8A4407C404E24A
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1836110769592709148

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1836476789096685987
  • noteId - 1836476789096685987
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E699819370F701085A037AE84DE5712DBBC9EEBC7D746E9D9C8A4407C404E24A Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1726685161265
  • tweetId - 1836110769592709148
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • There is no such “BREAKING NEWS,” and the Court made no such decision. More than a month ago, the Court ruled on the procedural question of whether the new Biden Title IX restrictions should be enforced while appeals are pending. The Court has not resolved the merits. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/24a78_f2ah.pdf

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-09-18 21:46:48 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-18 19:54:31 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-18 19:05:32 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-18 17:58:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-18 17:43:34 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-18 17:40:16 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-18 16:44:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-18 15:13:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-18 15:05:48 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-18 14:54:00 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-18 14:27:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-18 14:05:14 -0500 Rating Details
2024-12-05 02:33:55 -0600 Rating Details