Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-17 21:24:22 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. The proposed community note is 100% unnecessary, and doesn’t include any new details that are not included in the article that this tweet links to.

Written by 4E548A7A7C565880DBFF4E51CF8E094A805DF8F4C1DA52AF8C77FB5200DFB508
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1824757048287842342

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1824920230256058602
  • noteId - 1824920230256058602
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 4E548A7A7C565880DBFF4E51CF8E094A805DF8F4C1DA52AF8C77FB5200DFB508 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1723929862928
  • tweetId - 1824757048287842342
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN. The proposed community note is 100% unnecessary, and doesn’t include any new details that are not included in the article that this tweet links to.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-17 19:02:30 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 17:05:59 -0500 Rating Details