Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-17 21:18:12 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN, nothing in this post was misleading. If you want to defend Florence do it in the comments, that’s what they’re there for

Written by 313DF01EA35406CB85C17C480FCF8BD4F72AA66E5A216C01E1E0B44BBBC928DE
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1824559337043320891

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1824918676396490927
  • noteId - 1824918676396490927
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 313DF01EA35406CB85C17C480FCF8BD4F72AA66E5A216C01E1E0B44BBBC928DE Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1723929492458
  • tweetId - 1824559337043320891
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN, nothing in this post was misleading. If you want to defend Florence do it in the comments, that’s what they’re there for

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-18 06:19:55 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 17:49:53 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 16:26:58 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-25 09:22:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 19:53:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 17:08:05 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-29 23:52:55 -0500 Rating Details