Birdwatch Note
2024-08-17 11:26:03 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. The original post makes no assessment on the merits of the measure. Any assessments or comments on merits should go in the comment section.
Written by BC94866544737234696A9EE40AF2F001E1A5642AE664D67BBCC42F45E8E3EDBA
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1824518493510996370
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1824769657124917527
- noteId - 1824769657124917527
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - BC94866544737234696A9EE40AF2F001E1A5642AE664D67BBCC42F45E8E3EDBA Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1723893963498
- tweetId - 1824518493510996370
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. The original post makes no assessment on the merits of the measure. Any assessments or comments on merits should go in the comment section.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-18 08:17:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-17 15:38:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-17 11:10:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-17 10:00:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-17 12:54:30 -0500 | Rating Details |