Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-17 00:49:02 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The Court’s ruling, denying the government’s emergency motion to lift the lower court’s injunction against the Biden rule is an important victory in that fight. But, the Court did not “strike down” the rule. Its decision is both temporary and procedural. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/24a78_f2ah.pdf

Written by E699819370F701085A037AE84DE5712DBBC9EEBC7D746E9D9C8A4407C404E24A
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1824595274875994527

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1824609345029734540
  • noteId - 1824609345029734540
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E699819370F701085A037AE84DE5712DBBC9EEBC7D746E9D9C8A4407C404E24A Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1723855742111
  • tweetId - 1824595274875994527
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The Court’s ruling, denying the government’s emergency motion to lift the lower court’s injunction against the Biden rule is an important victory in that fight. But, the Court did not “strike down” the rule. Its decision is both temporary and procedural. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/24a78_f2ah.pdf

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-17 11:04:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 10:51:20 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 06:22:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 01:41:08 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 00:58:17 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 00:54:20 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 00:33:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 23:22:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 23:09:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 23:07:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 23:06:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 23:01:48 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 22:48:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 22:02:17 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 21:58:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 21:48:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 20:53:25 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 15:26:08 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 00:50:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 23:33:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 20:35:08 -0500 Rating Details