Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-17 00:46:28 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - Blatant CN abuse and does not address OP's claim. Attempting to use a fact-checking resource as ones's own pulpit is not permitted. https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

Written by 4469642FA46B475B21A3C674B9D71203C0EAC091EB66B6EBCB46D6F1714EF240
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1824485464851534179

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1824608701082374207
  • noteId - 1824608701082374207
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 4469642FA46B475B21A3C674B9D71203C0EAC091EB66B6EBCB46D6F1714EF240 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1723855588585
  • tweetId - 1824485464851534179
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN - Blatant CN abuse and does not address OP's claim. Attempting to use a fact-checking resource as ones's own pulpit is not permitted. https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-17 09:33:08 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 22:12:21 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 20:03:54 -0500 Rating Details