Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-16 21:49:44 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Please don’t abuse community notes. The tweet explicitly makes it clear that she reduced labours majority nor that she won. NNN if you are able to read.

Written by 7F0572C6093ED246DA534C3631B0BE2A2399D4332EE21C0BB33D4366B92F0991
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1824418346793832488

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1824564222627549307
  • noteId - 1824564222627549307
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 7F0572C6093ED246DA534C3631B0BE2A2399D4332EE21C0BB33D4366B92F0991 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1723844984096
  • tweetId - 1824418346793832488
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • Please don’t abuse community notes. The tweet explicitly makes it clear that she reduced labours majority nor that she won. NNN if you are able to read.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-23 19:33:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-18 02:39:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-18 02:23:15 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 16:55:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 07:11:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 16:53:33 -0500 Rating Details