Birdwatch Note
2024-08-16 15:21:57 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - Proposed note does not link to Article 5. Reading Article 5 clearly supports poster's proposition. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_17120.htm
Written by C37C2024049F6E4A2E56E95D318B4970D9B400D842DBEA0BCB6E9F4682D4FB6B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1824163533849792654
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1824466634456842618
- noteId - 1824466634456842618
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C37C2024049F6E4A2E56E95D318B4970D9B400D842DBEA0BCB6E9F4682D4FB6B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1723821717262
- tweetId - 1824163533849792654
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - Proposed note does not link to Article 5. Reading Article 5 clearly supports poster's proposition. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_17120.htm
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-23 11:53:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-16 23:16:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-16 20:39:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-16 12:30:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-16 11:06:36 -0500 | Rating Details |