Birdwatch Note
2024-08-16 10:55:07 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There is no factual evidence that shows Beyoncé's career would have changed because of Aaliyah. In fact Destinys Child was even more successfull than her at that time period. No thread of logic to suggest Aaliyah being alive would impact her career in any way https://www.billboard.com/charts/hot-100/2001-08-11/
Written by 1B125E6192A78D248C7D30A25AB7F0075021E1BDF3B86A657D1A447D72E2C96E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1824131752035512686
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1824399484912124218
- noteId - 1824399484912124218
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 1B125E6192A78D248C7D30A25AB7F0075021E1BDF3B86A657D1A447D72E2C96E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1723805707563
- tweetId - 1824131752035512686
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There is no factual evidence that shows Beyoncé's career would have changed because of Aaliyah. In fact Destinys Child was even more successfull than her at that time period. No thread of logic to suggest Aaliyah being alive would impact her career in any way https://www.billboard.com/charts/hot-100/2001-08-11/
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-08-18 21:56:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-17 23:39:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-17 20:41:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-17 14:37:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-17 13:18:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-17 06:46:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-17 06:16:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-17 02:16:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-17 01:00:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 19:12:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 17:03:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 16:00:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 15:50:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 14:51:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 14:36:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 13:51:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 11:40:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 11:22:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 10:40:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 09:03:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 08:38:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 07:57:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 06:20:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 06:10:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 06:07:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 05:59:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 05:56:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-23 16:10:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-17 21:05:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 20:25:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 18:19:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 16:22:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 10:43:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 10:24:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 10:04:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 07:53:28 -0500 | Rating Details |