Birdwatch Note
2024-08-16 07:00:21 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This paper has aleady been retracted by Cureus https://www.cureus.com/articles/203052-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-lessons-learned-from-the-registrational-trials-and-global-vaccination-campaign/retraction#!/ McCullough & co hawked it around until they found an anti vax journal with anti vax editors willing to publish it https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/preventing-deaths-isnt-sole-benefit-covid19-vaccination-contrary-epoch-times-article/ https://retractionwatch.com/2024/02/19/paper-claiming-extensive-harms-of-covid-19-vaccines-to-be-retracted/ https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/retracted-study-provides-greatest-hits-of-vaccine-misinfo/
Written by F84822F502E92F069659B7E05DBE49E5DF05899B154FF6E9E3455E102EBAC6CE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1824226553552920900
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1824340405686767648
- noteId - 1824340405686767648
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F84822F502E92F069659B7E05DBE49E5DF05899B154FF6E9E3455E102EBAC6CE Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1723791621978
- tweetId - 1824226553552920900
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This paper has aleady been retracted by Cureus https://www.cureus.com/articles/203052-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-lessons-learned-from-the-registrational-trials-and-global-vaccination-campaign/retraction#!/ McCullough & co hawked it around until they found an anti vax journal with anti vax editors willing to publish it https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/preventing-deaths-isnt-sole-benefit-covid19-vaccination-contrary-epoch-times-article/ https://retractionwatch.com/2024/02/19/paper-claiming-extensive-harms-of-covid-19-vaccines-to-be-retracted/ https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/retracted-study-provides-greatest-hits-of-vaccine-misinfo/
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-08-17 18:09:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 17:31:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 14:45:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 07:52:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 05:48:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 03:42:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 02:42:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 02:36:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 02:21:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-16 03:00:50 -0500 | Rating Details |