Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-16 05:35:00 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. OP is stating a personal opinion, linking of the website in the note is also not an independently verifiable source.

Written by 5B7B000590EA164C9C5C2CA99B1DCA15E65DEFA857E29D1C189DC58B7795E7C9
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1824295607709646898

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1824318924613358067
  • noteId - 1824318924613358067
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 5B7B000590EA164C9C5C2CA99B1DCA15E65DEFA857E29D1C189DC58B7795E7C9 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1723786500492
  • tweetId - 1824295607709646898
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN. OP is stating a personal opinion, linking of the website in the note is also not an independently verifiable source.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-17 03:20:16 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 05:55:50 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 04:12:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 03:11:53 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 02:57:58 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 02:10:50 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 00:53:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 00:52:21 -0500 Rating Details