Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-15 17:19:48 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The tweets have not been deleted, but the account was indeed hacked. x.com

Written by 0A27C388E8D71AF2A59FB6197384715AF47CF1C35F49CAC22798A2B0CCC42D93
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1823901229858107483

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1824133906766959001
  • noteId - 1824133906766959001
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 0A27C388E8D71AF2A59FB6197384715AF47CF1C35F49CAC22798A2B0CCC42D93 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1723742388800
  • tweetId - 1823901229858107483
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The tweets have not been deleted, but the account was indeed hacked. x.com

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-16 02:17:55 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 22:40:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 21:18:46 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 15:19:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 03:03:43 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 17:23:11 -0500 Rating Details