Birdwatch Note
2024-08-15 04:59:35 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There are several issues with this post within the “TRUTH” section: (1) doesn’t cite quoted article https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/explorations-of-the-mind/202311/in-praise-of-grandparents?amp (2) PT article does not quote and cite properly to its source (plagiarism) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026795/#CR50 (3) the Stephan journal article quote is making a passing introductory remark, not its conclusions
Written by 5AA969E2BDE45D4C5DC70D8291FEB5778D13C201DB290452A6D5E0685961F39F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1823860531620667504
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1823947623470129331
- noteId - 1823947623470129331
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5AA969E2BDE45D4C5DC70D8291FEB5778D13C201DB290452A6D5E0685961F39F Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1723697975400
- tweetId - 1823860531620667504
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There are several issues with this post within the “TRUTH” section: (1) doesn’t cite quoted article https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/explorations-of-the-mind/202311/in-praise-of-grandparents?amp (2) PT article does not quote and cite properly to its source (plagiarism) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026795/#CR50 (3) the Stephan journal article quote is making a passing introductory remark, not its conclusions
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-15 18:45:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 14:11:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 12:32:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 10:12:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 08:39:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 08:34:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 08:22:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 08:10:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 07:05:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 06:44:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 01:08:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 00:40:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-27 05:54:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 18:06:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 11:54:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 09:45:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 09:35:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 09:33:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 06:26:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 02:00:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 01:04:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-15 00:06:29 -0500 | Rating Details |