Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-14 23:37:04 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. La nota es errada, el tuit que emplea como fuente carece de rigor científico y su imagen establece una clasificación arbitraria. El sexo es un rasgo multifactorial y bimodal, no binario. Tratarlo de otro modo es reduccionista y falaz. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01639625.2020.1735030 https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ase.2002 + info: https://www.muyinteresante.com/naturaleza/60597.htm

Written by F67C410829616DC7360C02A6E221D9BCAB54D374A0B5FD20067891AC55A89226
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1823276623983948213

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1823866458033586640
  • noteId - 1823866458033586640
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F67C410829616DC7360C02A6E221D9BCAB54D374A0B5FD20067891AC55A89226 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1723678624052
  • tweetId - 1823276623983948213
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN. La nota es errada, el tuit que emplea como fuente carece de rigor científico y su imagen establece una clasificación arbitraria. El sexo es un rasgo multifactorial y bimodal, no binario. Tratarlo de otro modo es reduccionista y falaz. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01639625.2020.1735030 https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ase.2002 + info: https://www.muyinteresante.com/naturaleza/60597.htm

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-17 18:39:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-17 14:19:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-16 16:17:30 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 11:41:30 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-15 01:20:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-14 23:21:15 -0500 Rating Details