Birdwatch Note
2024-08-14 12:33:35 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - A claim that this is "whataboutism" is properly expressed in the replies (and there are already several to that effect).
Written by 50609487EAB1CC5E3CDE532E8D22832852F32B27AC6EE2B4075944CA9FEC9A88
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1823449017239392694
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1823699490240380943
- noteId - 1823699490240380943
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 50609487EAB1CC5E3CDE532E8D22832852F32B27AC6EE2B4075944CA9FEC9A88 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1723638815827
- tweetId - 1823449017239392694
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - A claim that this is "whataboutism" is properly expressed in the replies (and there are already several to that effect).
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-14 20:29:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-14 14:05:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-14 12:30:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-14 09:55:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-14 09:38:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-14 08:41:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-03 00:25:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-02 22:33:14 -0500 | Rating Details |