Birdwatch Note
2024-08-14 05:19:55 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The first note is factually incorrect. The linked CBC article states that the CRA conducted an audit based on an accusation. The article does not state that the audit corroborated the claim. The second note is an opinion. The place for opinions is in the comments not CN.
Written by 567B844D1E98595AA4D7C0E8EDA51D1270774481BBE8D673919DBE192DC01C23
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1823490574248268196
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1823590355121418347
- noteId - 1823590355121418347
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 567B844D1E98595AA4D7C0E8EDA51D1270774481BBE8D673919DBE192DC01C23 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1723612795988
- tweetId - 1823490574248268196
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The first note is factually incorrect. The linked CBC article states that the CRA conducted an audit based on an accusation. The article does not state that the audit corroborated the claim. The second note is an opinion. The place for opinions is in the comments not CN.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-14 05:57:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-04 23:51:42 -0500 | Rating Details |