Birdwatch Note
2024-08-11 13:23:15 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - The current proposed note is trying to argue with an opinion, and also arguing it badly. Post a reply in the comments.
Written by 954A8CC66AC4FA3A4CFC033F25E15874D49823952106D4BCBD7C25BD29D964BC
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1822597994224419244
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1822624824285409678
- noteId - 1822624824285409678
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 954A8CC66AC4FA3A4CFC033F25E15874D49823952106D4BCBD7C25BD29D964BC Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1723382595497
- tweetId - 1822597994224419244
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - The current proposed note is trying to argue with an opinion, and also arguing it badly. Post a reply in the comments.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-11 15:31:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-11 13:11:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-11 11:01:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-11 10:25:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-11 22:00:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-11 12:10:47 -0500 | Rating Details |