Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-09 00:35:59 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The wording of this post implies that 90% of Black Americans voted in Obama because he was Black. This isn't what the report linked presents. The study instead says that of the 88.7% of Black Americans who voted in Obama, 64.4% did so on the basis of race. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41674650

Written by 6F7616564D68C1053CD3E59B22C481D57F3C0C771737A1582CE60355EC0C88B2
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1821656168684835110

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1821706959017369639
  • noteId - 1821706959017369639
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 6F7616564D68C1053CD3E59B22C481D57F3C0C771737A1582CE60355EC0C88B2 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1723163759366
  • tweetId - 1821656168684835110
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The wording of this post implies that 90% of Black Americans voted in Obama because he was Black. This isn't what the report linked presents. The study instead says that of the 88.7% of Black Americans who voted in Obama, 64.4% did so on the basis of race. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41674650

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-11 15:06:10 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-09 15:52:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-09 04:59:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-09 04:15:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-09 03:59:55 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-09 03:45:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-09 03:41:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-09 03:32:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-09 03:22:53 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-08 23:29:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-08 23:10:58 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-09 12:30:35 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-09 06:40:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-09 05:30:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-09 04:51:30 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-09 04:42:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-09 04:01:17 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-09 02:44:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-09 02:04:29 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-08 20:17:55 -0500 Rating Details