Birdwatch Note
2024-08-08 19:52:38 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The cass review has been reviewed and considered to be poor science. https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf Additionally dr cass is known to be a TERF before being appointed to lead the review
Written by 0AD38E862325314A592A287EA719C9D5D0731463A0FF99798E375C64F178F36D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1812901552019153056
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1821635651835719931
- noteId - 1821635651835719931
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0AD38E862325314A592A287EA719C9D5D0731463A0FF99798E375C64F178F36D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1723146758410
- tweetId - 1812901552019153056
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The cass review has been reviewed and considered to be poor science. https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf Additionally dr cass is known to be a TERF before being appointed to lead the review
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-28 15:57:48 -0600 | Rating Details |