Birdwatch Note
2024-08-08 13:33:06 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - O post se refere ao uso de bloqueio judicial de domínios como ferramenta de censura, não a qualquer tipo de censura.
Written by 338D9D50902DC723CECD886643BAFC5BCBDF72BA70B7D0A8613AC0D7B2C2B150
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1821337726504857686
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1821540138985345210
- noteId - 1821540138985345210
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 338D9D50902DC723CECD886643BAFC5BCBDF72BA70B7D0A8613AC0D7B2C2B150 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1723123986370
- tweetId - 1821337726504857686
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - O post se refere ao uso de bloqueio judicial de domínios como ferramenta de censura, não a qualquer tipo de censura.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-08 17:58:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-08 10:52:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-08 09:19:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-08 08:55:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-08 08:41:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-08 08:35:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-08 20:43:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-08 08:41:25 -0500 | Rating Details |