Birdwatch Note
2024-08-08 04:04:01 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The proposed note could perhaps be applicable to the quoted post from user @LOdinaev. This isn't that post and doesn't make the claims that the note purports to debunk, so it's not needed here.
Written by CDA28A1582500CC232315541E8D039F6647ECF2BD1417C53F7211450320CC081
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1821069321348538444
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1821396923326083241
- noteId - 1821396923326083241
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - CDA28A1582500CC232315541E8D039F6647ECF2BD1417C53F7211450320CC081 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1723089841096
- tweetId - 1821069321348538444
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The proposed note could perhaps be applicable to the quoted post from user @LOdinaev. This isn't that post and doesn't make the claims that the note purports to debunk, so it's not needed here.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-08 14:30:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-08 07:30:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-07 23:29:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-15 12:40:24 -0500 | Rating Details |