Birdwatch Note
2024-08-07 19:04:15 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - Aside from being an opinion, the only CN at the time of this note being redacted doesn’t provide a valid source for the claim.
Written by 98885B9DFEE30407B778C47C05B341A4DC2B90B15383F9690F6E261D30586163
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1820909479514243205
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1821261089281135057
- noteId - 1821261089281135057
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 98885B9DFEE30407B778C47C05B341A4DC2B90B15383F9690F6E261D30586163 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1723057455737
- tweetId - 1820909479514243205
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - Aside from being an opinion, the only CN at the time of this note being redacted doesn’t provide a valid source for the claim.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-08 05:03:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-08 02:25:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-07 15:47:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-07 14:33:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-07 14:19:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-08 03:24:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-07 14:16:04 -0500 | Rating Details |