Birdwatch Note
2024-08-07 11:11:58 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The fact that the proposed note talks in vague terms about what gametes people "would" produce if things were different shows that gamete production is not a single 100% reliable test for binary sex.
Written by 475993857C772F683C184EB3899D8DAEFCD60C0D3EEC80A305672A317A1DB4AD
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1820807318331707640
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1821142236026855807
- noteId - 1821142236026855807
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 475993857C772F683C184EB3899D8DAEFCD60C0D3EEC80A305672A317A1DB4AD Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1723029118912
- tweetId - 1820807318331707640
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The fact that the proposed note talks in vague terms about what gametes people "would" produce if things were different shows that gamete production is not a single 100% reliable test for binary sex.
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-08-08 10:37:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-08 09:22:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-08 08:51:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-08 06:53:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-08 06:41:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-08 05:56:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-08 04:27:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-08 03:43:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-08 02:29:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 22:42:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 22:05:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 22:05:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 21:55:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 21:45:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 21:16:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 19:14:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 18:38:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 18:03:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 16:22:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 15:53:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 14:05:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 13:23:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 13:21:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 12:48:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 12:36:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 11:39:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 11:04:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 11:03:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 10:37:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 10:22:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 10:15:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 09:00:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 08:55:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 07:24:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 06:24:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 06:18:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-27 08:12:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-08 08:49:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-08 04:19:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-08 02:41:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-08 01:34:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 11:12:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 09:31:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 08:35:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-07 06:40:43 -0500 | Rating Details |