Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-07 01:12:13 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Finke’s motion for removing the exclusion of people *accused* of pedophilia was expressly because the existing language could allow discrimination against anyone *accused* of, for example, grooming. Republican members of the House were accusing their opponents daily. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/may/03/tweets/minnesota-bill-does-not-create-a-protected-class-f/ https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2024/07/trans-trailblazer-leigh-finke-is-facing-a-brutal-national-attack-campaign-from-the-right/

Written by 8077A614FB0FACCEB20837FDF7C10A64D8E05CCAAA55868A743CF7A23FA09BA6
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1820991301992538191
• noteId - 1820991301992538191
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 8077A614FB0FACCEB20837FDF7C10A64D8E05CCAAA55868A743CF7A23FA09BA6 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1722993133433
• tweetId - 1820909111187288108
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• Finke’s motion for removing the exclusion of people *accused* of pedophilia was expressly because the existing language could allow discrimination against anyone *accused* of, for example, grooming. Republican members of the House were accusing their opponents daily. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/may/03/tweets/minnesota-bill-does-not-create-a-protected-class-f/ https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2024/07/trans-trailblazer-leigh-finke-is-facing-a-brutal-national-attack-campaign-from-the-right/