Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-06 04:17:53 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. This post does not need a note since the main one is an opinion, the account is not stating a fact. Please use the quotes.

Written by FF05F190E543986C15DFDAE59A2F1EB1AEF44029399BE593FC733296871A10A2
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1820448073882988840

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1820675638950256912
  • noteId - 1820675638950256912
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - FF05F190E543986C15DFDAE59A2F1EB1AEF44029399BE593FC733296871A10A2 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1722917873499
  • tweetId - 1820448073882988840
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN. This post does not need a note since the main one is an opinion, the account is not stating a fact. Please use the quotes.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-06 19:59:15 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-06 17:33:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-06 15:15:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-06 05:07:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-06 05:41:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-06 02:56:20 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-05 23:28:33 -0500 Rating Details