Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-05 11:47:57 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The correct figure is £159m. £65m for Havertz £60m for Mount £34m for Gallagher https://x.com/FabrizioRomano/status/1820274202571604198 https://www.skysports.com/football/news/15205/12914637/mason-mount-and-kai-havertz-sales-represent-poor-business-from-chelsea-says-paul-merson

Written by CDB0C87D81269D31E07D17F4CCB1E0ED18DC549938A937F3B8392D085C5C7ACD
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1820373089131094032

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1820426513390473640
  • noteId - 1820426513390473640
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - CDB0C87D81269D31E07D17F4CCB1E0ED18DC549938A937F3B8392D085C5C7ACD Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1722858477337
  • tweetId - 1820373089131094032
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The correct figure is £159m. £65m for Havertz £60m for Mount £34m for Gallagher https://x.com/FabrizioRomano/status/1820274202571604198 https://www.skysports.com/football/news/15205/12914637/mason-mount-and-kai-havertz-sales-represent-poor-business-from-chelsea-says-paul-merson

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-06 08:48:35 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-06 00:57:46 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-05 18:00:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-05 10:42:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-05 09:13:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-05 07:44:29 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-05 07:24:08 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-05 06:53:12 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-05 07:53:28 -0500 Rating Details