Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-04 16:18:16 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Don‘t abuse community notes. The OP is not misleading because it is an expression of an identity oppressed by IOC and China. https://english.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=3713

Written by 6045D5294882F7F08A8C3E2EFB7337768D1FDBAA6D83CBED3A46239AF4E3EB28
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1820123747984277639

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1820132152702284282
  • noteId - 1820132152702284282
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 6045D5294882F7F08A8C3E2EFB7337768D1FDBAA6D83CBED3A46239AF4E3EB28 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1722788296280
  • tweetId - 1820123747984277639
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Don‘t abuse community notes. The OP is not misleading because it is an expression of an identity oppressed by IOC and China. https://english.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=3713

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-07 09:43:44 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-04 12:39:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-04 11:22:35 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-04 11:19:10 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-04 17:18:38 -0500 Rating Details