Birdwatch Note
2024-08-04 16:18:16 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Don‘t abuse community notes. The OP is not misleading because it is an expression of an identity oppressed by IOC and China. https://english.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=3713
Written by 6045D5294882F7F08A8C3E2EFB7337768D1FDBAA6D83CBED3A46239AF4E3EB28
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1820123747984277639
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1820132152702284282
- noteId - 1820132152702284282
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6045D5294882F7F08A8C3E2EFB7337768D1FDBAA6D83CBED3A46239AF4E3EB28 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722788296280
- tweetId - 1820123747984277639
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Don‘t abuse community notes. The OP is not misleading because it is an expression of an identity oppressed by IOC and China. https://english.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=3713
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-08-07 09:43:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-04 12:39:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-04 11:22:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-04 11:19:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-08-04 17:18:38 -0500 | Rating Details |