Birdwatch Note
2024-08-02 16:33:32 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Proposed CN restates the OP’s claim that JD Vance’s statement was inaccurate, making it redundant (while still correct), therefore NNN.
Written by 3033CF38847C7C9022761888BD3577C7A453818874178EAD262107282275F874
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817729281482711551
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1819411220610343347
- noteId - 1819411220610343347
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 3033CF38847C7C9022761888BD3577C7A453818874178EAD262107282275F874 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722616412676
- tweetId - 1817729281482711551
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Proposed CN restates the OP’s claim that JD Vance’s statement was inaccurate, making it redundant (while still correct), therefore NNN.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-02 15:29:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-02 13:27:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-02 13:22:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-28 19:29:10 -0500 | Rating Details |