Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-02 12:17:06 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

That "who's" should be "who", as any reputable writer would know. https://www.grammarly.com/blog/whos-whose/#:~:text=To%20recap%2C%20who%20is%20the,who%20is%20or%20who%20has.&text=Who's%20is%20a%20contraction.,make%20pronunciation%20easier%20and%20quicker.

Written by C59D99C264C7F15C034C41D061CBFA845A6EEE424AF6EFFFB2D630DAEC34B7DC
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1819346684339507552
• noteId - 1819346684339507552
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - C59D99C264C7F15C034C41D061CBFA845A6EEE424AF6EFFFB2D630DAEC34B7DC Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1722601026031
• tweetId - 1819007216214573268
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 1
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• That "who's" should be "who", as any reputable writer would know. https://www.grammarly.com/blog/whos-whose/#:~:text=To%20recap%2C%20who%20is%20the,who%20is%20or%20who%20has.&text=Who's%20is%20a%20contraction.,make%20pronunciation%20easier%20and%20quicker.