Birdwatch Note
2024-08-02 09:26:28 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
L'idée que Khelif ait des chromosomes XY n'en fait pas un “homme”, et n'est pas contradictoire avec le fait qu'elle soit une femme (identifiée comme telle à la naissance). La littérature scientifique parle bien de “femmes” (ou “femelles”) avec des chromosomes XY : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028209005147 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028208014970 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028202032429 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028205005820 https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/12/7/1434/700897 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17843286.1988.11717936
Written by D2D4379AC332601041196F32DCDCC9EEB027FA3C9198F7CF2482807238B79B52
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1819061999210287503
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1819303746419261660
- noteId - 1819303746419261660
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D2D4379AC332601041196F32DCDCC9EEB027FA3C9198F7CF2482807238B79B52 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722590788832
- tweetId - 1819061999210287503
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- L'idée que Khelif ait des chromosomes XY n'en fait pas un “homme”, et n'est pas contradictoire avec le fait qu'elle soit une femme (identifiée comme telle à la naissance). La littérature scientifique parle bien de “femmes” (ou “femelles”) avec des chromosomes XY : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028209005147 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028208014970 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028202032429 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028205005820 https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/12/7/1434/700897 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17843286.1988.11717936
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-24 16:21:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-05 01:26:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-04 02:35:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-03 00:56:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-02 07:40:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-02 07:34:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-02 05:36:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-02 05:00:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-02 11:05:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-02 10:02:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-02 05:52:02 -0500 | Rating Details |