Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-02 03:54:14 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN, expresa opinión personal sobre un hecho controvertido. Quienes lo consideren equivocado usen las respuestas, no las notas.

Written by 86D39C8E5DEAF1E67B320A9649FB308D6C7FA5D29796E36B5DB059C1B9399184
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1819070704396259404

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1819220135535694293
  • noteId - 1819220135535694293
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 86D39C8E5DEAF1E67B320A9649FB308D6C7FA5D29796E36B5DB059C1B9399184 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1722570854447
  • tweetId - 1819070704396259404
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN, expresa opinión personal sobre un hecho controvertido. Quienes lo consideren equivocado usen las respuestas, no las notas.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-02 10:52:48 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-02 08:15:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-02 07:35:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-02 02:51:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-02 01:34:06 -0500 Rating Details