Birdwatch Note
2024-08-01 22:32:04 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Random Twitter accounts dismissing the original Tweet aren’t reliable sources. Keep opinions and speculation in the replies.
Written by 5E8A334A1A041D8615CF1EEB7331754E63E7201847418FB5907C476EE2B98B1F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1818696483744735588
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1819139059979087993
- noteId - 1819139059979087993
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5E8A334A1A041D8615CF1EEB7331754E63E7201847418FB5907C476EE2B98B1F Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722551524527
- tweetId - 1818696483744735588
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Random Twitter accounts dismissing the original Tweet aren’t reliable sources. Keep opinions and speculation in the replies.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-06 09:59:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-01 19:49:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-01 19:17:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-01 18:58:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-25 10:44:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-02 17:27:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-02 11:24:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-01 21:17:58 -0500 | Rating Details |