Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-08-01 19:08:52 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

https://www.forbes.com/sites/trevorbutterworth/2014/10/02/when-data-journalism-goes-wrong/ This article does a good job of explaining the flawed methodology of the study that generated this implausible data. It was based on self-reported data (which is unreliable) and multiplied responses uniformly by 1.9.

Written by 7436046336C45B4B38F5256BE35F5C85F655CA448F4563D6178E6144F1C12356
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1818798532544917824

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1819087921850261949
  • noteId - 1819087921850261949
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 7436046336C45B4B38F5256BE35F5C85F655CA448F4563D6178E6144F1C12356 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1722539332248
  • tweetId - 1818798532544917824
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • https://www.forbes.com/sites/trevorbutterworth/2014/10/02/when-data-journalism-goes-wrong/ This article does a good job of explaining the flawed methodology of the study that generated this implausible data. It was based on self-reported data (which is unreliable) and multiplied responses uniformly by 1.9.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-02 09:35:53 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 20:10:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 18:44:35 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 18:42:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 18:00:11 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 17:17:38 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 16:58:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 16:56:33 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 16:50:33 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 16:42:40 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 16:20:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 16:17:59 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 16:11:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 16:11:27 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 15:30:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 15:19:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 15:13:54 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 15:12:32 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 15:10:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 14:58:16 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 14:57:38 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 14:51:10 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 14:43:58 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-02 12:43:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-02 03:00:21 -0500 Rating Details