Birdwatch Note
2024-07-31 20:19:17 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The CN countering the OP is missing the key point. There should NOT be any "pro-censorship" search suggestions or results offered unless specifically requested. Why would google ASSUME to present pro-censorship suggestions or content ahead of - or even equally? https://www.google.com/search?q=why+censorship&oq=why+censorship&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTINCAEQABiDARixAxiABDIHCAIQABiABDIHCAMQABiABDIHCAQQABiABDIHCAUQABiABDIHCAYQABiABDIHCAcQABiABDIHCAgQABiABDINCAkQABiDARixAxiABDIHCAoQABiABDIHCAsQABiABDIHCAwQABiABDIHCA0QABiABNIBCTE3MjE2ajBqN6gCD7ACAQ&client=ms-android-tmus-us-revc&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
Written by B0673AC8958F1CDB3D5CEC2AC5F7EB223177554694332A7324D3B40F49BC2341
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817990841585045893
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1818743255099486484
- noteId - 1818743255099486484
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B0673AC8958F1CDB3D5CEC2AC5F7EB223177554694332A7324D3B40F49BC2341 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722457157289
- tweetId - 1817990841585045893
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The CN countering the OP is missing the key point. There should NOT be any "pro-censorship" search suggestions or results offered unless specifically requested. Why would google ASSUME to present pro-censorship suggestions or content ahead of - or even equally? https://www.google.com/search?q=why+censorship&oq=why+censorship&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTINCAEQABiDARixAxiABDIHCAIQABiABDIHCAMQABiABDIHCAQQABiABDIHCAUQABiABDIHCAYQABiABDIHCAcQABiABDIHCAgQABiABDINCAkQABiDARixAxiABDIHCAoQABiABDIHCAsQABiABDIHCAwQABiABDIHCA0QABiABNIBCTE3MjE2ajBqN6gCD7ACAQ&client=ms-android-tmus-us-revc&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-04 08:01:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-02 07:41:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-01 07:31:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-31 16:08:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-31 15:30:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-19 13:41:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-29 05:24:56 -0500 | Rating Details |