Birdwatch Note
2024-07-31 17:48:00 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. The Cass Report's methodological flaws have been detailed in several academic papers including https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf.
Written by 8666CB2EAC2B373A1904F42E369A472DD9AD193A9D2EFD8F7BC006039AAF206E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1781283859889328217
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1818705183959847349
- noteId - 1818705183959847349
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8666CB2EAC2B373A1904F42E369A472DD9AD193A9D2EFD8F7BC006039AAF206E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722448080422
- tweetId - 1781283859889328217
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. The Cass Report's methodological flaws have been detailed in several academic papers including https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf.