Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-31 10:55:31 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

It is not censorship to retract a flawed study is not censorship. It is part of scientific review process. An earlier preprint was removed by The Lancet because of its many flaws. See list below: https://www.techarp.com/science/covid-19-vaccine-autopsy-retracted/ https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.34ZK3F9 https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/flawed-preprint-autopsies-inadequate-demonstrate-covid19-vaccines-caused-74-percent-deaths/

Written by 1F19112D4D120B3E8A09EC0F1C770B1E52020173A9CEEAFE49D21A6305D49B79
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1818350302091001871

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1818601377830195406
  • noteId - 1818601377830195406
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 1F19112D4D120B3E8A09EC0F1C770B1E52020173A9CEEAFE49D21A6305D49B79 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1722423331112
  • tweetId - 1818350302091001871
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • It is not censorship to retract a flawed study is not censorship. It is part of scientific review process. An earlier preprint was removed by The Lancet because of its many flaws. See list below: https://www.techarp.com/science/covid-19-vaccine-autopsy-retracted/ https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.34ZK3F9 https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/flawed-preprint-autopsies-inadequate-demonstrate-covid19-vaccines-caused-74-percent-deaths/

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-03 16:44:43 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-02 00:06:43 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 07:20:22 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 23:34:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 22:33:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 20:37:16 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 19:51:17 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 15:45:49 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 14:18:10 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 14:14:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 12:23:42 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 09:29:22 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 08:18:38 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 06:58:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 06:24:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-03 18:01:17 -0500 Rating Details