Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-31 06:11:16 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Visiblement, @critique65100 n’est pas réellement policier. Il s’agit d’un compte troll. https://x.com/critique65100?s=21

Written by 05EBDE3A3124B8EBDECA9930FE49EE21AAC7DC9B5D8286554C1AFF74E2361941
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817936930736070781

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1818529847108366767
  • noteId - 1818529847108366767
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 05EBDE3A3124B8EBDECA9930FE49EE21AAC7DC9B5D8286554C1AFF74E2361941 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1722406276859
  • tweetId - 1817936930736070781
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Visiblement, @critique65100 n’est pas réellement policier. Il s’agit d’un compte troll. https://x.com/critique65100?s=21

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-07-31 03:31:18 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 02:00:29 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 01:38:44 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 01:27:22 -0500 Rating Details