Birdwatch Note
2024-07-31 02:29:41 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The link shared in the CN actually supports the tweet. It says that (while boarding back to front is not very efficient) boarding front to back is the least efficient method. Therefore, boarding back to front is better than boarding front to back.
Written by 6DDCD5FF63EDED98FB4A4EDD5B8F550D11F8B1CB042F1F2F32CDB4C1CC4B7C3B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817918056204521900
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1818474081974374737
- noteId - 1818474081974374737
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6DDCD5FF63EDED98FB4A4EDD5B8F550D11F8B1CB042F1F2F32CDB4C1CC4B7C3B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722392981414
- tweetId - 1817918056204521900
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The link shared in the CN actually supports the tweet. It says that (while boarding back to front is not very efficient) boarding front to back is the least efficient method. Therefore, boarding back to front is better than boarding front to back.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-17 14:39:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-04 00:39:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-01 23:16:35 -0500 | Rating Details |