Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-30 18:51:36 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

本投稿はネタ的側面が強いため、冗談を冗談と受け取ることの出来ず空気の読めないノートは不要です。

Written by 2E445DA674AC594449922346C1F2C069C402BBDA418E4CF63175010A65CE6BBE
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817412125595500607

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1818358801424433294
  • noteId - 1818358801424433294
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 2E445DA674AC594449922346C1F2C069C402BBDA418E4CF63175010A65CE6BBE Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1722365496390
  • tweetId - 1817412125595500607
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • 本投稿はネタ的側面が強いため、冗談を冗談と受け取ることの出来ず空気の読めないノートは不要です。

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-08 14:32:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-03 03:02:00 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-01 12:40:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 23:14:22 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 03:53:31 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 01:36:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-14 12:14:46 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-09 01:41:45 -0500 Rating Details