Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-30 15:42:26 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. This is clearly a (satirical) personal opinion. Arguments should be made in the comment section as per CN guidelines.

Written by D12FE594F80E197A5E6A8C9DB5AF13CF3129CC7BCB59D5FE0C66850DD793DA0C
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817931114541203640

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1818311195696451832
  • noteId - 1818311195696451832
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - D12FE594F80E197A5E6A8C9DB5AF13CF3129CC7BCB59D5FE0C66850DD793DA0C Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1722354146300
  • tweetId - 1817931114541203640
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN. This is clearly a (satirical) personal opinion. Arguments should be made in the comment section as per CN guidelines.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-07-31 09:56:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 01:26:23 -0500 Rating Details