Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-30 11:00:21 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The film contains defamatory accusations, which is why the British High Court issued an injunction to prevent its distribution. Robinson was given the opportunity to substantiate his claims, but the evidence he provided turned out to be false. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Hijazi-v-Yaxley-Lennon-judgment-220721.pdf https://www.logicallyfacts.com/en/article/tommy-robinson-silenced https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/tommy-robinson-flees-uk-failing-appear-court-libellous-film-rally/

Written by 83B0CABDBB38982FC1F9E2F25F32EB6CE3B97AC4AECCE1E5AC3D80BFEFA42D69
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1818240208963248176
• noteId - 1818240208963248176
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 83B0CABDBB38982FC1F9E2F25F32EB6CE3B97AC4AECCE1E5AC3D80BFEFA42D69 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1722337221742
• tweetId - 1817184820151070917
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 1
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• The film contains defamatory accusations, which is why the British High Court issued an injunction to prevent its distribution. Robinson was given the opportunity to substantiate his claims, but the evidence he provided turned out to be false. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Hijazi-v-Yaxley-Lennon-judgment-220721.pdf https://www.logicallyfacts.com/en/article/tommy-robinson-silenced https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/tommy-robinson-flees-uk-failing-appear-court-libellous-film-rally/