Birdwatch Note
2024-07-30 02:03:34 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. Meta stated it was an “error” This doesn’t change the fact that there can be a conclusion drawn that it was in fact a deliberate attempt to censor image.
Written by 4BFA3F7296248CD4BA57F5DB55A61ED58B68476E840BD789118D7C23B7B2984D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817941294389264583
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1818105121219412041
- noteId - 1818105121219412041
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 4BFA3F7296248CD4BA57F5DB55A61ED58B68476E840BD789118D7C23B7B2984D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722305014315
- tweetId - 1817941294389264583
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. Meta stated it was an “error” This doesn’t change the fact that there can be a conclusion drawn that it was in fact a deliberate attempt to censor image.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-08 07:02:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-03 13:37:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-19 03:41:10 -0500 | Rating Details |