Birdwatch Note
2024-07-29 23:40:31 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN While the post was not leaked, noting it is not helpful. There is so much more than "Leaked" that is worthy of debate in comments.
Written by D5DD974ED0ADA0AA4B602A73732B1624513453D41A33519252016AC435BF39D8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1818017740621250582
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1818069122988839394
- noteId - 1818069122988839394
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D5DD974ED0ADA0AA4B602A73732B1624513453D41A33519252016AC435BF39D8 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722296431668
- tweetId - 1818017740621250582
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN While the post was not leaked, noting it is not helpful. There is so much more than "Leaked" that is worthy of debate in comments.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-01 07:00:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-31 01:54:59 -0500 | Rating Details |