Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-29 13:42:59 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The documentary in question repeated statements that he had made earlier and for which he had already lost a defamation court case which also ordered him not to repeat those statements. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cjerxd00rlxo

Written by F4825E0939E3033EBCA96CD4C30AA45514263E855269EC86E7AB8467B8667249
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817563211488469478

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1817918747291644309
  • noteId - 1817918747291644309
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F4825E0939E3033EBCA96CD4C30AA45514263E855269EC86E7AB8467B8667249 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1722260579308
  • tweetId - 1817563211488469478
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The documentary in question repeated statements that he had made earlier and for which he had already lost a defamation court case which also ordered him not to repeat those statements. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cjerxd00rlxo