Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-29 07:09:59 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988), is a landmark decision by the US Supreme Court in which the Court held that parodies of public figures, even those intending to cause emotional distress, are protected by the 1st & 14th Amendments to the US Constitution: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/485/46/#:~:text=Hustler%20Magazine%2C%20Inc.-,v,%2C%20485%20U.S.%2046%20(1988)&text=The%20First%20Amendment%20protects%20parodies,cause%20distress%20to%20their%20targets.

Written by E99F94EED8228520EAA1772C1A821E67D20E72D35ECDD54A716829F504F32D87
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1816974609637417112

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1817819848312775030
  • noteId - 1817819848312775030
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E99F94EED8228520EAA1772C1A821E67D20E72D35ECDD54A716829F504F32D87 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1722236999956
  • tweetId - 1816974609637417112
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988), is a landmark decision by the US Supreme Court in which the Court held that parodies of public figures, even those intending to cause emotional distress, are protected by the 1st & 14th Amendments to the US Constitution: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/485/46/#:~:text=Hustler%20Magazine%2C%20Inc.-,v,%2C%20485%20U.S.%2046%20(1988)&text=The%20First%20Amendment%20protects%20parodies,cause%20distress%20to%20their%20targets.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-12 09:10:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-12 03:10:18 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-09 18:50:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-08 16:58:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-08 03:57:42 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-03 04:30:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-02 22:23:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-02 07:55:20 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 15:29:20 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-27 19:56:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-20 06:03:20 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-17 23:13:58 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-17 22:52:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-10 18:36:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-29 14:23:06 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-30 22:37:07 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-21 00:15:16 -0500 Rating Details
2024-11-05 17:08:57 -0600 Rating Details
2024-10-24 21:09:26 -0500 Rating Details