Birdwatch Note
2024-07-29 03:00:11 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Please note that this article is frequently re-posted by The Economist (even if the article was written in 2021). https://x.com/fleroy1974/status/1817289265472004222
Written by 362A28200881193E4D4DBBC2356C37D78626BC7DBD9CEF1E7C617E30902F386D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817059414580371534
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1817756983132672282
- noteId - 1817756983132672282
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 362A28200881193E4D4DBBC2356C37D78626BC7DBD9CEF1E7C617E30902F386D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722222011728
- tweetId - 1817059414580371534
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Please note that this article is frequently re-posted by The Economist (even if the article was written in 2021). https://x.com/fleroy1974/status/1817289265472004222
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-09 12:06:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-19 21:43:48 -0500 | Rating Details |